Skip to main content
TopMiniSite

Back to all posts

How to Get [Int] Instead Of [[Int]] Haskell?

Published on
4 min read
How to Get [Int] Instead Of [[Int]] Haskell? image

Best Haskell Programming Guides to Buy in October 2025

1 Real World Haskell

Real World Haskell

  • AFFORDABLE PRICING: QUALITY BOOKS AT A FRACTION OF THE NEW PRICE!
  • ECO-FRIENDLY CHOICE: REDUCE WASTE BY CHOOSING PRE-OWNED BOOKS.
  • FAST SHIPPING: QUICK DELIVERY TO GET YOUR NEXT READ SOONER!
BUY & SAVE
$24.40 $49.99
Save 51%
Real World Haskell
2 Learn You a Haskell for Great Good!: A Beginner's Guide

Learn You a Haskell for Great Good!: A Beginner's Guide

  • AFFORDABLE PRICES FOR QUALITY READS-SAVE MONEY, ENJOY MORE BOOKS!
  • ECO-FRIENDLY CHOICE-REDUCE WASTE BY PURCHASING USED BOOKS.
  • QUALITY ASSURANCE-CAREFULLY INSPECTED FOR GOOD CONDITION GUARANTEED.
BUY & SAVE
$35.00 $44.95
Save 22%
Learn You a Haskell for Great Good!: A Beginner's Guide
3 Effective Haskell: Solving Real-World Problems with Strongly Typed Functional Programming

Effective Haskell: Solving Real-World Problems with Strongly Typed Functional Programming

BUY & SAVE
$55.05 $57.95
Save 5%
Effective Haskell: Solving Real-World Problems with Strongly Typed Functional Programming
4 Haskell in Depth

Haskell in Depth

BUY & SAVE
$57.13 $59.99
Save 5%
Haskell in Depth
5 Learn Haskell by Example (Bookcamp)

Learn Haskell by Example (Bookcamp)

BUY & SAVE
$51.84 $59.99
Save 14%
Learn Haskell by Example (Bookcamp)
6 Programming in Haskell

Programming in Haskell

BUY & SAVE
$42.99 $47.00
Save 9%
Programming in Haskell
7 Parallel and Concurrent Programming in Haskell: Techniques for Multicore and Multithreaded Programming

Parallel and Concurrent Programming in Haskell: Techniques for Multicore and Multithreaded Programming

BUY & SAVE
$25.83 $44.99
Save 43%
Parallel and Concurrent Programming in Haskell: Techniques for Multicore and Multithreaded Programming
8 Soar with Haskell: The ultimate beginners' guide to mastering functional programming from the ground up

Soar with Haskell: The ultimate beginners' guide to mastering functional programming from the ground up

BUY & SAVE
$45.99
Soar with Haskell: The ultimate beginners' guide to mastering functional programming from the ground up
9 Practical Haskell: A Real-World Guide to Functional Programming

Practical Haskell: A Real-World Guide to Functional Programming

BUY & SAVE
$43.85 $59.99
Save 27%
Practical Haskell: A Real-World Guide to Functional Programming
10 Miriam Haskell Jewelry

Miriam Haskell Jewelry

  • AFFORDABLE PRICES FOR QUALITY READS-SAVE MONEY ON YOUR NEXT BOOK!
  • ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY CHOICE-REDUCE WASTE WITH USED BOOKS.
  • UNIQUE FINDS: DISCOVER RARE TITLES AND HIDDEN GEMS IN GREAT SHAPE!
BUY & SAVE
$49.19 $59.99
Save 18%
Miriam Haskell Jewelry
+
ONE MORE?

In Haskell, if you want to obtain a single integer value instead of a list of integers, you can use the head function to extract the first element from the list. For example, if you have a list containing an integer x, you can write "head [x]" to get x as a single integer instead of [x] as a list of integers. However, keep in mind that using head directly on an empty list will result in an error, so it's important to make sure the list is not empty before using this approach.

How to ensure that Haskell recognizes a single integer as an individual value?

In Haskell, integers are recognized as individual values by default. However, if you want to explicitly specify an integer as a single value, you can simply assign it to a variable using the let keyword like this:

let myInt = 42

This will create a variable myInt with the value 42. You can then use myInt as a single integer value in your code.

Alternatively, you can also use the type keyword to define a new data type that represents a single integer value. For example:

newtype SingleInt = SingleInt Int

This defines a new data type SingleInt that contains a single integer value. You can then create instances of SingleInt using the constructor SingleInt like this:

let mySingleInt = SingleInt 42

This will create a value mySingleInt of type SingleInt with the integer value 42.

How to explicitly specify the type of a value in Haskell to avoid list wrapping?

In Haskell, you can explicitly specify the type of a value using type annotations. To avoid list wrapping, you can use the :: operator to specify the exact type of the value. For example:

x :: Int x = 5

This specifies that x is an integer value. If you want to specify a list of integers, you can do so like this:

xs :: [Int] xs = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

This specifies that xs is a list of integers. By using type annotations, you can explicitly specify the type of a value and avoid list wrapping.

How to distinguish between a single integer and a list of integers in Haskell?

In Haskell, you can distinguish between a single integer and a list of integers by checking the type of the object.

A single integer will have the type Int or Integer, while a list of integers will have the type [Int] or [Integer].

You can use pattern matching to check whether a value is a single integer or a list of integers. Here is an example:

checkType :: Either Int [Int] -> String checkType (Left _) = "Single integer" checkType (Right _) = "List of integers"

main = do let singleInt = Left 5 let listOfInts = Right [1, 2, 3]

putStrLn (checkType singleInt) -- Output: Single integer putStrLn (checkType listOfInts) -- Output: List of integers

In this example, the checkType function takes an Either Int [Int] type as input. Left is used to represent a single integer, while Right is used to represent a list of integers. The function pattern matches on the input to determine the type and returns a string indicating whether it is a single integer or a list of integers.

What is the correct syntax to represent a single integer in Haskell?

The correct syntax to represent a single integer in Haskell is:

42

This example represents the integer value 42.

How to prevent Haskell from automatically interpreting a lone integer as a list?

To prevent Haskell from automatically interpreting a lone integer as a list, you can explicitly specify the type of the integer using a type annotation. For example, instead of writing just 5, you can write (5 :: Int) or (5 :: Integer) to indicate that it is an integer type and not a list.

Another way to prevent this automatic interpretation is by using the integer in a context where it cannot be interpreted as a list. For example, if you are using the integer in a mathematical operation like addition or multiplication, Haskell will not interpret it as a list.

Additionally, you can use the -XNoMonomorphismRestriction flag when compiling your Haskell code to disable the monomorphism restriction, which is responsible for automatically interpreting lone integers as lists. This will allow you to write standalone integers without them being automatically converted to lists.

By using these methods, you can prevent Haskell from automatically interpreting a lone integer as a list and ensure that it is treated as the integer type you intend.